Reincarnation

From New Age Village

Jump to: navigation, search

Introduction

The concept of reincarnation is simply that our soul lives multiple lifetimes, gaining experience through them. It is not within the scope of this book to attempt to prove reincarnation; it is a “given” in the Michael teachings, which are of limited use without this idea. However, perhaps we can dispel some of the confusion around it. For those who are skeptical about reincarnation, there are many books on the subject.1 I myself have had vivid, emotionally charged recollections of many past lives, and have regressed others to remember some of theirs. In fact, I believe that almost anyone who is adequately open and relaxed can be guided to remember their past lives. There is other evidence supporting reincarnation. For instance, there have been many documented cases of young children vividly describing places they had never been and past events in accurate historical detail to which they had never been exposed. Also, an earlier version of the Bible contained references to reincarnation that were removed by the Church. Furthermore, a majority of people have some kind of belief in reincarnation, even a great number of Americans. None of this is “hard” proof of reincarnation. One can always come up with other possible explanations, although I often find them to be convoluted. I doubt that anything involving the nonphysical can be proven conclusively to the satisfaction of those who rely solely on physical evidence. (Scientists are continually “proving” things that are later “unproved” anyway.) If we have been reincarnating, it stands to reason that some part of our consciousness knows about it and can confirm it. In fact, some part of us knows the truth about everything we’ve experienced. Although intellectual exploration has its place—otherwise, why bother with books like this one?—the ultimate referee in debates about such things as reincarnation is our inner knowing. Aligning with that is part of maturing spiritually. Without inner knowing, we can argue “till the cows come home” and be no closer to resolving the issue.

Here are some comments by Michael on reincarnation:

You are now the sum of all you have ever been.

Each morning, you put on different clothing, but you are the same person you were the previous day. Perhaps certain things about you changed during your sleep, but there is continuity. When you die, it is like going to sleep at night. Your time on the astral plane between lives is like your night’s sleep. When you “awaken,” you “put on” a new body (as well as new overleaves and life circumstances) rather than different clothing, but it is still you.

You may have limiting beliefs you have carried over a number of lifetimes. It is sometimes useful to know what went into forming them, but the point is to see and release them. Whatever ways help you do this are all to the good.

REINCARNATIONAL SELVES

Our astral self, which might be described as the outer “layer” of our essence, casts parts of itself into reincarnational selves in order to live on the physical plane, much the same way our spark cast a part of itself into our essence in order to exist in the dimensional universe. The reincarnational self is the foundation of our personality, what we start with, and what is left after death. It includes our overleaves and identity but without the temporal elements, such as our physical body and the problems of day-to-day life. There has been some question as to whether reincarnational selves are reabsorbed back into the essence after the death of the body, or continue to have an independent existence. Apparently, the answer is “both.” Each reincarnational self is like a subpersonality of the essence that continues to develop under the “umbrella” of the essence. On the level of our personality, we spawn many subpersonalities. For example, when we were children, we developed what is later the subpersonality called “the inner child.” That part of self never ends. In childhood, it was who we were, but because we have grown, it is now just a part of who we are. If it was traumatized, it calls out for attention so that it can be healed. Once it is healed, it becomes integrated into the whole personality. It is not the focus of our personality anymore, because it doesn’t need to be, but it keeps developing and doing its “job” of bringing wonder and playfulness into our lives. The same is true of our reincarnational selves. When we lived those lives, they were who we were, but now, they are just a part of who we are on the level of our essence. Like the inner child or other subpersonalities, those needing healing or resolution call out for our attention when we are in a position to offer it. In any lifetime, there is likely to be a handful of them clustered “around” us. Once we experience the necessary healing and resolution, they can integrate into our essence. In future lifetimes, we are likely to be less conscious of them. However, the fruits of their lessons become available to the whole self. They also continue to develop and grow, while remaining part of our essence, just as our inner child can continue to develop and grow in us. Perhaps they can even be thought of as spinning off from our essence while remaining part of it, as though tethered to it by an infinitely stretchable string. In any case, they go on to become creators by expanding our essence, becoming creative aspects of it.

As your personality (or reincarnational self) integrates its lessons, your essence integrates your personality. Your essence and personality are organically linked, and integration is a gradual process. In some cases, personality elements from lifetimes thousands of years ago are still not integrated. The personality does not end at death, even by suicide. Once in a while, a complex personality with overleaves that severely abrade internally cannot “get it together” on the astral plane after death, and disassembles itself, usually with the essence’s blessing. Probably the essence does not have enough experience for the personality to reconcile itself.1

Our other reincarnational selves are both us and not us. One way of expressing this is that we “share essence” with them. There is a part of us, the personality, that has not lived before, but it is also true that our essence has spawned other personalities. We are connected to them through our essence. We could say that those who believe in reincarnation and those who don’t are both right. In a sense, our essence fragments into reincarnational selves in the same way our entity fragments into essences, our cadre fragments into entities, and so forth. Although in one sense we are not our other reincarnational selves, in another sense we are all that is contained within our essence, as well as within our entity, cadre, and so forth. After death, the reincarnational self, in tandem with its essence, has the opportunity to review the previous lifetime and integrate as many of its lessons as possible. What it is not yet capable of resolving or willing to look at must wait for another reincarnational self to handle. Some issues, and most karmas, must be resolved on the physical plane. Obviously, the more we can resolve while living the life generating the issues, the better. A characteristic of being on the spiritual path is living consciously and deliberately “cleaning up after ourselves”—staying up to date on handling our issues and not generating karmic debts. This requires being willing to face facts about ourselves and grow.

like to specialize—for instance, there may be a soul with whom we like to have business relationships but with whom we rarely if ever have mate or family relationships. When people ask Michael through me about their past lives, Michael reads the information from their energy, rather than looking it up in the akashic records. It is both easier and more practical. The past lives that impact our present life are like open folders on our desk, as opposed to those filed away; they are relatively accessible. Those “open” lifetimes are the very ones that relate to the important life issues about which a person is likely to ask Michael. As with any other type of information retrieval, it is one thing to pick up raw data, and another to translate and interpret it accurately. Undoubtedly, even Michael occasionally makes at least minor errors when extemporaneously summarizing a lifetime from the psychic “pictures” in a person’s energy. Usually, the particular details are relatively insignificant anyway; it is knowing the dynamics of the situation—the nature of the relationships, karmas, attitudes, emotions, and so forth—that can be most helpful. In my experience, most of us have lived a series of mostly ordinary lifetimes. It is a bit of a joke in the New Age movement that sometimes many people claim to have been the same famous historical person, and it seems that nobody was ever a peasant. No doubt egotism occasionally plays a part in this, through unbridled imagination or through psychics and channels who tell clients what they want to hear. However, reality is complex, and it is possible that several claims to have been the same person are simply misunderstandings. We might be read as having been a particular person because we really were. If an historical figure experienced a walk-in, or if more than one essence was sharing his body1 (which is not common but is more common for those who have wide impact), more than one person can accurately claim to have been him. We also may have been closely associated with that person in some way, and that association can be confused with actually having been that person, since his energy is in our aura. Here are some forms of association that can be misread in this way:

1. We may have been physically present with that person, as a friend, family member, student, even antagonist, or in some other form.

2. We may have been working with him energetically from the astral plane, as a spirit guide or as a member of a group supporting him or his task in some way.

3. We might have been that person, or the equivalent of that person, in a parallel universe.

For instance, a person may have been Joan of Arc in a parallel universe but not in this one. The essence who incarnated as Joan of Arc in this universe might not have lived in that one, or may have had a different name and occupied a different historical role in it. He may also have been someone comparable to Joan of Arc in another universe who didn’t exist in this one, giving him a special resonance with the person known as Joan of Arc in this universe. This sort of thing, however, is rare. In general, when we are tuning in to past lives, we can’t always be certain that we’re picking up an experience from this universe—it might be from one that is presently on the same “track” as this one, but that wasn’t on the same track in the past.

4. Someone spiritually close to us may have been that person. For example, we can access the past lives of cycled-off entity mates and other nonphysical souls who are working intimately with us in this lifetime.

5. The historical figure may simply be an important archetype we relate to.

Some people attribute past-life memories to tapping into the cell memory (akashic record) of, say, a carrot we ate. In other words, the memory belongs to someone whose body died and decomposed. A cell of that body is now in the carrot, and we unlocked that memory. I find this idea convoluted. A similar idea is that memories of past lives derive from our genes—we are accessing the records of lives of our physical ancestors. But if that were true, why would someone remember one particular ancestor and not another? Why might someone remember an ancestor in the distant past but not several more recent ones? What makes more sense to me is that if we remember a past life, it was a past life in which we had at least some involvement. However, there is some truth in most ideas. Here, Michael comments on the cell memory theory:

Cell memory is not different from remembering one of your own past lives, because you create your body and store important memories in your cells. You do not remember past lives unrelated to you from eating a carrot, although it is possible to unlock the history of the cell of a carrot. If you do, it may correlate with a lifetime related to you and trigger a memory.:

On an essence level, we experience our lifetimes consecutively; in other words, lifetime forty-three follows lifetime forty-two. However, because our essence exists somewhat beyond time, time is elastic for it. Therefore, lifetime forty-three is not necessarily later in time, according to the calendar, than lifetime forty-two; it is possible to have what our essence considers to be our next lifetime in the past or in the same physical plane time frame. During our present era, with its population explosion and unprecedented changes, the Michael fragments I channel are aware of essences with as many as eight reincarnational selves living simultaneously.1 Many of us have two or three. This is different from spinning off a parallel self, who has the same basic personality (including overleaves) and life task we do, but in a parallel universe. Reincarnational selves are in the same universe (and are on earth, in our case), but have different overleaves and life circumstances. Reincarnational selves living simultaneously are just like reincarnational selves who lived in the past except that they happen to be living now. Of course, if you request a Michael Reading chart, you will get your overleaves, not those of a reincarnational self. If your essence has more than one reincarnational personality in this time frame, from its point of view it did not cast all of them at the “same time.” It finished lifetime forty-two, for example, and then “bent” time a little to begin lifetime forty-three at about the same time lifetime forty-two began. This is not very difficult or disorienting, although reincarnational personality forty-three might subconsciously remember some of civilization’s advances that had been available later in lifetime forty-two and be impatient for them to arrive. For your essence, it’s like reading a novel written with consecutive chapters that take place in different locales but at the same time, so that readers can follow various characters. More difficult, disorienting, and rare is incarnating in the past, in a time frame before an already-completed lifetime. This is usually only undertaken by more experienced or experimental essences. (Scholars especially enjoy this game, as well as anything else unusual.) For your essence, this might be something like reading the chapters of a novel out of order, or reading a novel in which the chronology is jumbled. It is true that, from the vantage point of higher planes, all events are simultaneous. However, time is real on the physical plane, and also has some influence on the astral and causal planes.2 Since it is the astral aspect of essence (astral self)3 that directly incarnates, our essence is not completely outside time. Even if we previously lived in the future and then incarnated backward in time, our vantage point in this lifetime is the same as in any other: all we can see are probabilities. Having lived in the future might help us tune in to the probabilities more strongly, making us more visionary of what is possible. However, we don’t know which probabilities will manifest in this parallel universe; at any moment in any parallel universe, the future always consists only of various probabilities, not certainties, since each person has free will. If we remember an event from a past life in the calendar’s future, we still cannot be certain that it will belong to this universe’s future, just as we can’t be certain that a past life we remember from the calendar’s past belongs to this universe. When our lifetimes are not in chronological order, it is not that we’re jumping around on the physical plane, like someone in a time machine; it is that our essence is experiencing the lifetimes in nonchronological order. If, for example, someone is now fourth-level mature, his essence might have experienced being third-level mature in the year 2100—that lifetime contributed to his present level of consciousness, even if the specific memories that might arise from it cannot be assumed to be the future of this particular parallel universe. In Michael’s People,1 Michael says, “No fragment is able to ‘return’ as its own grandparent.” This is not a contradiction to the concept of having simultaneous or future reincarnational selves. If we are incarnate in more than one place in the same time frame, we almost always pick diverse locations. Since the purpose of incarnating is to expand our horizons, we don’t want to duplicate experiences. It is probably impossible to meet another reincarnational self in the flesh. From the standpoint of the selves that preceded them, future selves do not exist except as probabilities, even though from their own standpoint, they are valid. Simultaneous selves occupy distinct realities or “sectors” of this universe, even though they are in the same time frame. This is a case of our essence “recycling” a universe, taking maximum advantage of its resources, practicing an “economy” that characterizes not only the cosmic design, but also all great art. Despite occupying distinct realities, we can communicate with our simultaneous (as well as future and past) reincarnational selves—for example, in meditation or in the dream state. Theoretically, if we did meet another reincarnational self, he would probably seem like a close entity mate. His body could look quite different from ours, although we tend to look somewhat similar facially, especially around the eyes, from lifetime to lifetime.2 Despite the fact that lifetimes are consecutive, lifetime forty-three may be about entirely different lessons than lifetime forty-two. In our present lifetime, we might be completing lessons related to lifetimes twenty-nine, thirty-two, thirty-six, and forty-one. As mentioned, if we think that we have had past lives with someone, we probably have, unless our attraction is based only on body types. Here are some comments Michael made on differentiating body-type attraction from past-life and other essence connections.

Body-type attraction is a relatively shallow type of attraction. It can be powerful and quite pleasing, but it is mostly limited to the physical level. So if you share a sense of emotional connection with someone, or a feeling that you deeply understand each other, or a sense of increased spiritual energy between you, as opposed to just physical attraction, you have some other kind of connection. If you are in the same entity, you usually feel like a comrade or sibling. If you are in another entity in the same cadre, you are likely to feel both similar and complementary to one another, on more levels than just the physical. You have not necessarily had significant past lives with everyone in your cadre, but if you are meeting someone in your cadre, there is a good chance that you have past-life connections of some kind, especially if you have a feeling of knowing him from somewhere, or if you find memories stimulated. If he is a member of your cadre but you have not had significant past-life connections, there is a feeling of relatedness but also a feeling of a blank slate between you. Of course, you can have significant past-life connections with someone not in your cadre.

Often, when you first meet someone in this lifetime whom you have known in others, you have a sense that you are starting where you left off. If you immediately feel motherly toward him, for instance, and you are not a mother in this lifetime, you are probably continuing from a past life in which you were his mother or a mother figure. You might find yourself wondering why you want to take care of him, or feel so protective of him. Those feelings are likely to fade as you develop a relationship with him based on how things are in this lifetime.

BETWEEN LIFETIMES

I channeled that, on average, a person waits about seventy years after death before reincarnating. However, I understand that “Jessica Lansing” channeled the number as being about two hundred. I think that through me, Michael was referring to more recent times, when the growing population has created more opportunities for incarnation. Perhaps over the entire span of one’s physical plane cycle, two hundred is the average. Whatever the case, the length of time between lifetimes varies considerably from person to person and depends on the particular circumstances. Generally, younger souls reincarnate more quickly, whereas older souls become increasingly specific in their needs and tend to take more time setting up their lifetimes. To the younger soul, almost any kind of experience can look interesting and worthwhile. The older soul wants to avoid repeating what he has already done and seeks the particular circumstances needed to repay karmas, complete monads, and otherwise grow. Also, older souls become increasingly comfortable with the astral interval and its fluidity, whereas younger souls can be threatened by it and often can’t wait to get back into the structure of the physical plane. (Younger souls, like children, need more structure.)

Being between lifetimes is like being an actor between acting jobs. Just as one actor can play many different parts, your essence expresses itself through many different personalities. No matter how varied they are, the nature of your essence shines through, just as you can usually recognize the actor behind his various roles.

Before reincarnating, we plan our upcoming lifetime. Once in a while, we take on too much.

Why would a soul take on circumstances that are more difficult than it can handle?:
Inexperience, mainly. To make an analogy, a contractor building his first house lacks experience and may try to do things that look fine on paper but do not prove to work. Until souls have adequate practical experience on the physical plane, they may bite off more than they can chew. There are also souls who, upon death, rush into the next available body, without adequately examining what they are getting into. However, those who are willing to take advantage of their guides’ advice make fewer such mistakes.:
Also, events do not always happen as expected, and halfway into a lifetime, souls can find themselves in unforeseen circumstances that overwhelm them. That is part of the lessons of the physical plane. There is nothing wrong with that; you might say that it aids in keeping everyone on his toes. If you find yourself in a situation you cannot handle—in other words, that you cannot understand, process, and effectively respond to—you can sometimes leave it. Other times, you suffer the consequences. This accounts for a relatively small part of human experience. Most people are in circumstances about right for their level of skill, even if they are difficult.:
Circumstances that cannot be handled are sometimes experienced to pay back karmas. You probably would not be very well equipped to handle being physically or mentally tortured, and it is not an experience that your soul would likely seek out deliberately for its growth, although there ultimately would be much growth resulting from such an ordeal. However, if you had subjected someone else to torture in a prior lifetime, your soul might choose to be in a circumstance in which that debt can be erased. Of course, not everyone who experiences torture is erasing a karmic debt—sometimes people are the unfortunate victim of karmic formation; they are in the “wrong place at the wrong time.”:
Although the repayment of karma can teach much, it goes under the heading of “growing through pain.” The enlightened soul seeks to grow through joy, but everyone has done his share of growing through pain. You continue to do so to some extent until you learn not to.:
The soul is not all-knowing. If it were, it would not embark on this journey. There is no all-knowing source anywhere. We are all participating in a book whose final chapter will never be written. We are eagerly waiting to see what happens next!:

Between lifetimes and after completing the physical plane, there are informal “classes” and study groups of all kinds available.1 There are also many opportunities for contemplation, rest, and healing. Some souls work closely with the physical plane as spirit guides, or as “light workers,” who work with the larger energy patterns of the planet to bring growth and healing. There are those who help nonphysical souls who are earthbound or otherwise stuck, those who help souls plan their next lifetime more skillfully, and so on. Souls are also free to “waste their time” if they wish. Any time we are astral, whether between lifetimes, after finishing the physical plane, or during sleep or out-of-body experiences, we can visit the astral aspects of any place in the universe, although we tend to stay fairly close to home. For example, we might visit Venus to work on lessons on love, or for rest and relaxation; the Sun, to re-energize; or Mars or Mercury, for stimulation. Some people feel that they are not from Earth and feel uncomfortable here. They may be picking up memories of recent travels to other places between lifetimes. To make an analogy, a New Yorker returning from six months in Tahiti might have trouble readjusting. When we visit another part of the universe between lifetimes, we virtually always remain astral rather than physically incarnating on another planet. We do not want to form karmas (which would require being physical) or otherwise get deeply involved; it is like being an exchange student. Having karmas on more than one planet at the same time would be messy. Despite our lack of involvement, we can learn things or have experiences that contribute to our growth. Soul age only advances when we are on the physical plane, because soul age relates to our physical-plane perspective, but our other studies and explorations, including those on the astral plane of other planets, can support that advancement and be enriching in general. In Messages from Michael,1 Michael said, “We have told you that humans invariably reincarnate in human form, and this is a fact. As long as a species is planet-bound,2 as you are, then their experience will be limited to the species into which all of the entity members are cast.” Some people say that extraterrestrials are now incarnate on earth, walking among us, or even that they themselves are extraterrestrials, “not from this planet.” A friend of mine was told by a channeled entity that this is his first lifetime on earth, that he is from another planet. I channeled him as being in my entity and this lifetime as being his 653rd on earth!—a very high number. I suspect that the other channeled entity was picking up on a part of him that is connected with another planet. We are all complex and have diverse connections; perhaps he is getting help from an astral essence from another planet, and some of that essence’s energy is in his body, along with his own essence’s energy. However, he looks like an earthling to me! The point is that while we’re incarnate on earth, this is home. In a sense, none of us are strictly from this planet. Ultimately, we are all from the Tao, and most of us have had previous cycles on other planets. Nevertheless, even if we began our current cycle elsewhere, we’re here now. According to my channeling, there are a few people who can more or less legitimately say that they are from another planet—they are like diplomats, some of whom shuttle back and forth—but this can be problematic.Anything is possible, so I’m not ruling out the possibility that someone from another species that is not planet-bound could be physically incarnate here, but that could be problematic. For one thing, it can take a while to get used to a new planet, which is partly why there is a lengthy infant soul cycle. Someone from a planet that is significantly different from earth could be disoriented and make a lot of faux pas. If he formed karma with someone here, he might obligate himself to return for more lifetimes, and when would it end? He would have to “commute” between planets, juggling his obligations on both of them. It’s complicated enough to deal with one sentient species! (The situation would be easier if he had already cycled off on the other planet.) So although anything is possible in the universe, you can see why such an arrangement is rare. In some New Age circles, being identified as an extraterrestrial, like being identified as a walk-in, has a certain cachet, but “aliens among us” are not necessarily wiser or more evolved than the garden-variety earthlings here, just as Englishmen are no better than Americans, although Americans tend to romanticize them. We are all eternal sparks of the Tao. Some people who are attracted to the idea of not being from earth are in denial of their humanity; they have an unhealthy lack of acceptance of life’s imperfections and human physicality, perhaps due to childhood or past-life trauma. Those on the spiritual path often feel out of step with the world. Since the world is not in harmony with the universe at the moment, this might be a sign of being more in step with the universe. But denying our humanity, although perhaps a temporarily useful survival mechanism, comes at great cost; it limits our ability to be where we are effectively and to enjoy our lives.


NUMBER OF PAST LIFETIMES

I no longer channel on my Michael Reading charts the number of past lifetimes a person has had. Although reincarnation is intrinsic to the Michael teachings, the number of lifetimes per se is not particularly important (although it is sometimes interesting). When I was including it on charts, the lowest number of past lives I saw was fifteen, and the highest was 1735.1 The average number of past lives in my practice was perhaps around a hundred. Channeling in one of the Yarbro books stated that the average person spends seven lifetimes per soul age level, of which there are thirty-five, which suggests that the average person has two hundred forty-five lifetimes before cycling off. Simon Warwick-Smith and José Stevens stated in The Michael Handbook that it takes about three lifetimes to complete a level. Both sources agreed that it takes about two hundred years on the physical plane to complete a level, so the disagreement was about the average length of a lifetime. That obviously has been different during different eras. Also, different levels tend to take different amounts of time. A sixth level of any soul age, for example, usually takes far longer than a seventh.

The specific number of lifetimes has some significance.:
Lifetimes group into clusters, generally five per cluster. Five clusters gather into greater clusters of twenty-five lifetimes. Seven greater clusters gather into segments of 175 lifetimes. These have significance vibrationally, but there is no compulsion to complete a segment.:

Finishing five, twenty-five, or one hundred seventy-five lifetimes constitutes a completion apart from soul age. One might, for instance, do a cluster in China, or in various religious orders. It’s like finishing a year of school: we have completed our course work, but that doesn’t necessarily correlate with our process of inner learning, which is what soul age is about. Michael said “generally” five per cluster because lifetimes lasting less than about twenty years don’t count toward a cluster.

Having a relatively high or low number of past lives is not meaningful of itself. A friend who is also seventh-level old has had forty-two past lives, and I’ve had five hundred forty-four. I see no substantial differences between us based on that; if anything, she is more “street smart” than I am. Someone with few lifetimes may be just as involved here as someone with many, but may spend proportionately more of his time “behind the scenes” on the astral plane. He may be active as a spirit guide, for instance, or as a member of one of the many groups that energetically support growth and healing on the physical plane. Some people work with nature in a deva-like form between lifetimes. Fewer lifetimes may also indicate a less in-depth experience of the planet, like someone who chooses to read the abridged version of War and Peace instead of the full-length version. Such a soul might have a lot of interests in other parts of the universe. Since we choose everything, having a lot of lifetimes is not necessarily an indication of being a “slow learner” or “not getting it right.” Michael does not regard physical incarnation as a prison sentence to be made as short as possible, but as an opportunity as valid as any other. Certainly, many people do get stuck in limited, repetitive karmic patterns, but others come simply because of what they wish to accomplish. I wrote earlier of repetitive numerical patterns in cadence positions on my Michael Reading charts. This also occurred with respect to the number of past lives. For a while, patterns combining ones, twos, threes, and fours, such as 123, 134, 224, and so on kept coming up. After a couple of years, the pattern changed so that the digits varied more, but the total number of lifetimes tended to be between sixty and ninety-nine. Sometimes, during a session of channeling charts, two or more of them listed the same number of lifetimes, or several formed a pattern, such as being in the nineties. There were plenty of exceptions to these patterns, but their existence raised concerns in me that there was something wrong in my channeling. I would have expected more randomness in what came up. I have also experienced patterns with other information on the chart, such as a string of people with discarnate priest task companions, or with eleven previous cycles. (It was comforting when another channel complained to me that she was channeling a lot of charts with eleven previous cycles as well—I hadn’t said anything to her about it.) When I asked Michael about patterns, they told me:

You do tend to magnetize people at certain times who share commonalities. The number of past lives enters into patterns. Those who have each completed one hundred eleven past lives, for example, have resonances and might be drawn to you in the same incoming wave.:

Numbers do have specific vibrations, and this being an orderly universe, it makes sense that certain vibrations would be attracted to me, and I to them, at certain times. In any case, there’s no way for me to validate numerical information—for instance, I can’t tell how many past lifetimes a person has had from anything I can objectively measure or observe about him. However, since I am able to consistently validate many other items on the charts, I am less skeptical about those I can’t.

CUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Western View of Reincarnation

shep-rein

Reincarnation in the New Testament

fjfjfjf

Vedanta Philosophy: Five Lectures on Reincarnation (By Swami Abhedananda)



Back to Life After Death

Personal tools
encyclopedia