The Real Point About Sarah Palin

People are really missing the point about Sarah Palin. The liberal elite media wants to focus on her abuse of power, her misrepresentation of her record on the Bridge to Nowhere and other policy issues, her lack of knowledge, etc. However, what really matters here is her husband, Todd–he is totally hunkalicious! He’s hotter than global warming! He can melt the Arctic National Wildlife Preserve and turn polar bears into land bears faster than all the rest of the Republicans combined.

What the good people of small-town America (with populations of 4999 or
less) really want is a Second Gentleman who looks as good in a swimsuit as
he does in a suit, who’s alluring but dignified, and Todd’s the man. After
five babies, he still has a great figure. He can fix your oil rig AND watch
your kids. Straight women and gay men want to have sex with him; straight
men and lesbians want to go fishing with him. He’s the man who can bring
America together.

As Dennis Kucinich said, “Wake up, America!!” Who cares about Sarah Palin’s
record or qualifications? She doesn’t even know what a Vice-President
does–how much harm could she do? What really matters is that we need Todd
Palin for Second Hunk. He can warm up my igloo anytime.

No Comments »

Sarah Palin in “Annie Get Your Gun”

A few years ago, I saw Sarah Palin in a summer stock production of the Broadway show “Annie Get Your Gun” (Reba McEntire was out for that performance), and she was pretty good, especially in the song, “You Can’t Get a Man with a Gun,” although apparently, she did.

In hindsight, the casting was extraordinary: Frank Butler, the nemesis that
Annie Oakley later falls in love with, was played by none other than Joe
Biden, on his summer recess from the Senate. He’s a sage, and she has a sage
ET, so they both like performing. Anyway, here’s the lyrics of one of their
duets that I think foreshadows the upcoming debates eerily: Truly a case of
life imitating art.

SARAH: Anything you can do I can do better
……I can do anything better than you
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can, yes, I can

JOE: Anything you can be I can be greater
……Sooner or later I’m greater than you
SARAH: No, you’re not
JOE: Yes, I am
SARAH: No, you’re not
JOE: Yes, I am
SARAH: No, you’re not
JOE: Yes, I am, yes I am

JOE: I can shoot a partridge with a single cartridge
SARAH: I can get a sparrow with a bow and arrow
JOE: I can live on bread and cheese
SARAH: And only on that?
JOE: Yes
SARAH: So can a rat

JOE: Any note you can reach I can go higher
SARAH: I can sing anything higher than you
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can

SARAH: Anything you can buy I can buy cheaper
……I can buy anything cheaper than you
JOE: Fifty cents
SARAH: Forty cents
JOE: Thirty cents
SARAH: Twenty cents
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can, yes, I can

JOE: Anything you can say I can say softer
SARAH: I can say anything softer than you
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can, yes, I can

JOE: I can drink my liquor faster than a flicker
SARAH: I can do it quicker and get even sicker
JOE: I can open any safe
SARAH: Without being caught?
JOE: Sure
SARAH: That’s what I thought (you crook)

JOE: Any note you can hold I can hold longer
SARAH: I can hold any note longer than you
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can, yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t - yes, you can

SARAH: Anything you can wear I can wear better
……In what you wear I’d look better than you
JOE: In my coat
SARAH: In your vest
JOE: In my shoes
SARAH: In your hat
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can, yes, I can

JOE: Anything you can say I can say faster
SARAH: I can say anything faster than you
JOE: Noyoucan’t
SARAH: YesIcan
JOE: Noyoucan’t
SARAH: YesIcan
JOE: Noyoucan’t
SARAH: YesIcan
JOE: Noyoucan’t
SARAH: YesIcan

JOE: I can jump a hurdle
SARAH: I can wear a girdle
JOE: I can knit a sweater
SARAH: I can fill it better
JOE: I can do most anything
SARAH: Can you bake a pie?
JOE: No
SARAH: Neither can I

JOE: Anything you can sing I can sing sweeter
SARAH: I can sing anything sweeter than you
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Oh, yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can
JOE: No, you can’t, can’t, can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can, can, can, can
JOE: No, you can’t
SARAH: Yes, I can

Here was Sarah’s signature song, which she performed quite convincingly:

YOU CAN’T GET A MAN WITH A GUN

Oh, my mother was frightened by a shotgun, they say
That’s why I’m such a wonderful shot.
I’d be out in the cactus and I’d practice all day,
And now tell me what have I got?

I’m quick on the trigger with targets not much bigger than a pinpoint
I’m number one, but my score with a feller
Is lower than a cellar, oh you can’t get a man with a gun.

When I’m with a pistol, I sparkle like a crystal
yes, I shine like the morning sun,
but I lose all my luster, when with a bronco buster,
oh you can’t get a man with a gun.

With a gu-un, with a gu-un, oh you can’t get a man with a gun

If I went to battle with someone’s herd of cattle
You’d have steak when the job was done.
But, if I shot the herder, they’d holler bloody murder
and you can’t shoot a male in the tail like a quail,
Oh you can’t get a man with a gun.

I’m cool, brave, and daring to see a lion glaring
when I’m out with my Remington.
But a look from a mister will raise a fever blister
oh you can’t get a man with a gun

The gals with umbrellas are always out with fellers
in the rain or the blazin sun
But a man never trifles with gals who carry rifles
oh you can’t get a man with a gun.

With a gu-un, with a gu-un, oh you can’t get a man with a gun.

A man’s love is mighty, he’ll even buy a nightie
for a gal who he thinks is fun.
But they don’t buy pajamas for pistol packin mamas

and you can’t get a hug from a mug with a slug
oh you can’t get a man with a gun.

*Music and lyrics by Irving Berlin

Ah, so many memories from that little production of “Annie Get Your Gun”! It
was in a small, old-fashioned town that still believed in summer stock. They
didn’t want or need any of that new-fangled technology, like electrical
lights; the whole production was lit by torches.

John McCain was also a member of that cast. He played Buffalo Bill. He had
auditioned for the lead, Frank Butler. His agent campaigned hard for the
part–he said that McCain was uniquely qualified for it because he’d been a
POW. The director thought it might be good publicity to have his name on the
flyers they gave out after church when coffee and mayonnaise jello rolls
were served. Unfortunately, McCain can’t sing worth beans, and Frank Butler
is a demanding role. In fact, McCain’s voice sounds like a cross between
Wile E. Coyote and the Chipmunks. However, he gave a terrific performance as
Buffalo Bill Cody–it was a role he was born to play.

Sarah Palin doesn’t have a great voice, either, which is why she was just
cast to understudy Reba McEntire, but boy can that gal sell a song! During
the auditions, the director noted her “congeniality” and “spunk,” then
added, “I hate spunk.” When she was first cast, she asked, “What the f*ck
does an understudy do every day? Can someone please tell me that?” Still,
the one time she went on, the night I happened to be there, the audience
adored her, despite her flubbing her lines and singing off-key. That’s what
I love about summer stock audiences in Small Town America–they’re so
supportive of their actors. They really know how to have a good time, unlike
those dead serious people who live in cities with populations larger than
4999 and who care about things like “professionalism” and reviews by the
Broadway Media Elite. As far as they were concerned, their production of
“Annie Get Your Gun” was “darned good” and they were ready to shoot anyone
who said otherwise–that’s real dedication.

Barack Obama also auditioned for the show, but the director felt that he
wasn’t “Injun enough.” (The director then went on to cast all Caucasian
actors to play the Native Americans in the show. Go figure.) What a show
that would have been had he been in it. The man can sing, dance, and act–a
true triple threat. There’s talk of a revival with a new cast–one can only
hope.

No Comments »

Prop 8

PROP 8

Wow, the election is just two months away! All eyes are on the tight Presidential race. (If you’re getting insane anti-Obama emails, snopes.com is a good source for refuting them.)

Another matter that is as close to my heart is defeating California’s Prop
8, which would constitutionally ban gay marriage, which we recently finally
got here. Most of these reactionary state initiatives have passed elsewhere,
but we have a fighting chance to defeat it here.

If you would like to donate to this worthy cause, I have set up a page for
that:

Act Blue

Towards the top of the page is a series of menus; one says “Take Action.” If
you are available to volunteer or spread the word, there are links telling
you how you can do that.

No Comments »

Barack Obama

BARACK OBAMA

A year or two ago, I was curious about Obama, and checked out from the library the audiobook on CD of his autobiography, with him reading it. I have never been overawed by him (in terms of my political views, Dennis Kucinich is the best match). However, my strong impression from that experience is that he’s a highly reflective and thoughtful person, and dedicated to serving others–traits not often found in politics. He’s obviously brilliant but also humble–he doesn’t take himself or the quicksilver fame that seriously; he has consistently been unwilling to fan hype about himself, even when it might have been to his political advantage. He doesn’t seem to be in this for his ego.

I also don’t find him to be weak in any way. People often confuse gentleness
and goodness with weakness, but true strength is gentle; only the insecure
need to bluster. The perjorative “Bambi” suggests a naivete that I do not
see in him. He seems to be extremely aware of the sharks swimming around
him; he’s just choosing not to become one. He’s a politician and is trying
to win–why bother, otherwise? But he’s managed to stay decent and
reasonable throughout, something I’ve not seen in most other candidates.

Some people have been stereotyping priests here in ways that have not
largely been my impression of them, but even if they were accurate, I have
not seen impulsiveness or disconnection in him. He seems quite engaged with
the details of policy, and is careful to think and gain knowledge before
acting–in my book, what a good leader does.

If he said in the debates that he doesn’t intend to micromanage if he’s
President, that’s not unusual among leaders. Reagan, a sage, went to bed
every night at 9 and put in scant time in the office. Executives have
varying styles in this regard. I can’t imagine that Obama would slack off.

McCain immediately reacted to the Russian invasion of Georgia as if it were
the black-and-white aggressor/victim situation the media first depicted, and
looked to gain mileage from it. However, reading something about the
background, it seems that it is far more complicated than that. The Russians
probably view it as being parallel to the way Americans view our invasion of
Iraq. I’m impressed that Obama gave a more measured, knowledgeable response
rather than making short-term political capital of it that could backfire
later. All we need are more wars.

McCain is famous for his hot-headedness and impulsiveness, and no one thinks
he’s a priest (sage/warrior or warrior is the consensus). He is an
intellectual lightweight, at best, who has flip-flopped on many issues, an
opportunist using his POW history for his personal gain. Obama, on the other
hand, has been quite consistent.

Personally, I wish that he was more Michael Moore-like in the sense of being
willing to call a spade a spade and risk offending others. However, he
clearly sees a higher good in not doing that. I hope he’s right.

The idea of the Supreme Court becoming more right-wing should concern anyone
who wants to see checks and balances. There is much of concern about a
possible McCain/Palin Presidency. It seems more important, though, to
remember what we’re *for*.

I’m under no illusions that an Obama/Biden Presidency would suddenly give us
anywhere near an ideal government, but there is clearly a decency,
intelligence, respect for fact, and many other positive traits operating in
them that one can be for.

No Comments »

Farmer in Dell: It’s Not Easy to Put Lipstick on a Pig

By Shepherd Hoodwin

DELL, IOWA–Listeners can always count on NPR to delve into the deeper issues in the news. In the aftermath of Swinegate, the shocking scandal in which Barack Obama baldly slandered Sarah Palin without ever mentioning her name while pretending to merely attack War Hero John McCain, NPR decided to answer the age-old question, Can you actually put lipstick on a pig?

Most people assume that you can, due to the popular Muppets star Miss Piggy,
who was never seen in public without being fully made up. However, NPR
interviewed several witnesses who alleged that she was strictly fictional.
Producers of Sesame Street did not return phone calls asking for comment.

NPR then sent a reporter out into the field, or, more precisely, the sty,
one belonging to farmer John Smith in Dell, Iowa. Ready with a tube of his
wife’s Avon ApocaLips, in her favorite shade, Swollen Glands, “Farmer John”
approached his sow, Emily, whom he considered to be among his loveliest and,
certainly, his most cooperative.

Emily appeared to enjoy the attention. However, Smith encountered a problem
that he compared to that of a drag queen with a very bad case of five
o’clock shadow: pigs lips are bristly. He was able to put a heavy layer of
lipstick on her, but it still looked splotchy; there was simply no way to
get an even sheen.

As a test, NPR afterwards left Emily with a boar named Sam, who seemed
indifferent to her new look, even when, according to psychic animal
communicator Sylvia Swatchmore, she asked, “Do you notice something
different about me?” At first, Sam thought it was her hair, then wandered
off when he heard some slop being served.

Smith’s conclusion was that you can, indeed, put lipstick on a pig, but it’s
not a good look, unless you combine it with heels and a tasteful string of
pearls. That, of course, was Miss Piggy’s signature, for good reason,
according to Smith. “The classics never go out of style,” he maintained.

Will Smith try lipstick on other barnyard animals? “Probably not,” he said,
“although now that you mention it, Bessie has lovely dark eyes that might be
highlighted with mascara and liner.”

No Comments »

There have been several instances over the years when someone has requested the Michael chart of a relative whom they assumed was baby or young due to his/her rigid religious and/or political views, and I’ve gotten the relative
as, say, early old. Assuming that my channeling hasn’t always been wrong in these instances, it illustrates that essence and personality aren’t always congruous, at least not in the ways we might expect.

Heredity endows clans with the power to keep its members in line through
fear of of being shunned and left to die–it’s powerful stuff. I was a
member of a spiritual group from ages 16 to about 30 that discouraged
members from looking outside its own literature for knowledge, and I didn’t
do it much; I became much better informed after I drifted away from it. The
leader, a king with a chief feature of arrogance, didn’t think much of
psychology or politics, for example, although glimpses of his showed a
decidedly conservative viewpoint, despite his being an old soul. It seems to
me that most groups lean toward conservatism other than those specifically
formed for a progressive purpose.

Therefore, those who currently derive their sense of community from
membership in a group that “requires” certain types of thinking have a
strong disincentive to think differently. Our hard-wired need to belong and
feel safe via the protection of a larger community may trump our need to
sift through our beliefs, especially those that don’t obviously impact our
daily lives.

Many of our religious and spiritual beliefs reside on the surface of our
consciousness, not so much where we live everyday. If we don’t value
questioning them, they may be like the Sunday china we take out for company,
but otherwise don’t look at much. Many people assume that “if they’re good
enough for my parents, they’re good enough for me,” or something like that.
In this time near the election, many are taking out their Sunday china
without first examining it for chips and washing off the dust: some not only
don’t bother to become informed but strongly resist doing so because it
seems like too much trouble to overcome their inertia. Instead, they just
parrot a few things they hear on radio or TV that support their old
thinking.

People today are so busy. Many don’t have the time or the interest to read
extensively about current events, and there’s nothing wrong with that. We
each have to make our own priorities, and no one can do it all. However, it
doesn’t take a lot of investment to become well enough informed to make a
reasoned choice in the voting booth.

Michael once said through me that a world with only progressives would be
like a car with tires that have no tread (friction): things would move
forward too quickly, without a chance to absorb those changes, and the “car”
would skid off the road. On the other hand, too much conservatism is like a
car that gets stuck because the road is too rocky. The U.S. seems much more
in danger of the latter at the moment.

I’ve certainly observed progressive friends repeating something that my
reading suggests isn’t accurate, and I don’t hesitate to mention it if I
think s/he’s open. However, I’ve observed more inaccuracies, and resistance
to being informed, on the right than on the left. My theory is that
conservatism, by definition, doesn’t want things to change much, so there is
less incentive to be informed. That doesn’t make them “bad,” stupid, or
younger souled, and where they live Monday through Saturday may well be a
quite kind-hearted and generous place. There are also, of course, some
well-informed conservatives–they just seem to be a smaller percentage of
their ranks.

I also observe a gap between the voting public and those who represent them;
in general, the leadership of both is to the right of the voters, but the
neocon leadership in the U.S. has been bold and outrageous, more so than its
voters would prefer, and the nominally liberal leadership has been timid and
paralyzed, less active than its voters would prefer.

Neoconservatism, which isn’t really the same as conservatism, is based on
the idea of not taking no for an answer: they don’t want the government
putting on the brakes to whatever they want to do. Although the function of
conservatism in general is to put on the brakes to change, the neocons want
to return to the old days when those in power did pretty much whatever they
wanted to do–that feels like freedom to them.

Any fair, well-reasoned and fact-based argument deserves to be heard. There
are certainly some good arguments for conservative and libertarian views,
such as smaller government. Since 1980, they have had an impact on everyone;
even many of the most liberal politicians no longer assume that big programs
are the answer to problems, and consider the marketplace and incentives more
than before. So these ideas have provided some balance. Since the Clinton
Presidency, there has been a blurring of the lines between conservatives and
liberals in both some positive and negative ways.

The idea of government leveling the playing field for the individual is
pretty recent. Most of history has been about the rich and powerful
governing in such a way as to stay that way. Things have rarely been good
for the average person, with the traditional small governments (outside the
military) that some long to return to. Sure, governments can easily get out
of hand, like everything else–the key is checks and balances. But do we
really want to go back to the bad old days when if you were sick and poor,
you would stay that way and could die on the street as far as the government
was concerned? “Government services” consisted of carrying off your corpse
to a mass grave. Today we have libraries, schools, mass transit, fire
departments, police departments, etc., all designed to help level the
playing field. How many really believe that these government services are a
negative? And if these, why not health care and a few other things to
improve the general quality of life? And do we in the U.S. really need a
military larger than all the rest of the world’s put together?

There’s a new book out about Cheney this week; the author emphasized that
even when Cheney lied baldly about Iraq (even to his own party members), he
was driven by “principle”–things he deeply believes in–in particular, that
the U.S. needed to invade Iraq. So it isn’t a question of a lack of
principles, but which principles the person subscribes to. Cheney’s, like
those of most idealogues, include “the end justifies the means.” Most of us
believe that we’re in the right most of the time, but I consider it a basic
ground rule that actually being right includes respecting the right of
others to choose.

I agree with Michael that politics is full of maya, or illusion. Those
enraptured by either Obama or Palin have short memories as to how much the
last person they were enraptured by changed things. But I do think that
citizenship, including being informed, does matter–it informs our
collective choices.

I understand feeling overwhelmed by the flood of political material right
now, although I’m forwarding more than usual because there are so many
pieces that I think are excellent and important. I see the lies being spread
about Obama (that he’s a Muslim terrorist, for gods sakes!) and if I can get
out more information grounded in reality, I feel like I’m doing some good.

For me, it’s a balancing act: remembering that it won’t matter a hundred
years from now, but it will matter in the next twenty-five; being
non-attached but not coldly detached, either. I care a lot, but I hope I
will be peaceful if things don’t go the way I wish them to. We don’t need to
grow through pain as much as we have collectively chosen to, but if was good
enough for my parents,…. :)

Yes, writing here is preaching to the choir somewhat, but not entirely. No,
I don’t expect to convince anyone whose mind is made up. But this will be a
close race–maybe it helps, and if it doesn’t, at least I feel that I’m
doing what I can.

Across the spectrum, many beliefs sit on the surface and don’t necessarily
reflect the deeper reality of who we are. It’s not a bad idea to take out
the china once in a while and see if it’s worth putting out for Sunday
dinner, or if it’s time for a new set.

No Comments »

Michael Muffins, or “Let ‘em Eat Corn”

The Michael teachings Yahoo Group started a goofy discussion of corn muffins after I mentioned the great Gershwin musical, “Of Thee I Sing,” as a still-relevant satire on politics. I cited one song in which a Presidential candidate, a Congressional Committee, and the Supreme Court rhapsodize about the corn muffins made by his fiancĂ©e. This discussion branched out into bran muffins, buttermilk, and other important topics, but I’ll contain my comments here to just corn muffins.

MICHAEL MUFFINS, OR “LET ‘EM EAT CORN”

Once again, this List has changed my life. Today, while shopping at Henry’s, I found an organic corn bread/muffin mix from Arrowhead (2 lbs. for $3–that makes 173 muffins). My last excursion into baking ended badly for all concerned, but you have reminded me of the importance of corn muffins in the larger scheme of things, inspiring me to remember that I’m an eternal being of Light and that I *can* make corn muffins. Please pray for me.

If all else fails, the Amazon entry for the Jiffy mix tells how to make just
one serving in a frying pan, as well as bear-shaped muffins, macaroni bread
(are you listening, Dave?), and baked corn dogs. There’s really nothing you
can’t make with corn muffin mix. Jiffy claims that the Tao created the
physical plane from a box of its mix, simply adding one egg; an added plus
for the ever-efficient Tao was that they were on sale at seven for a dollar.

Some might say that corn muffins are off-topic for a Michael list. However,
the Michael teachings are all about the Universe, and I think that most List
members would agree that corn muffins are a part of the Universe. Perhaps
there is less agreement about bran muffins, but hopefully Meredith’s recipe
and Nancy’s piece in praise of bran has put that issue to rest.

I asked Michael for comments on this subject. They said, “Although we do not
predict the future, there is currently a 67% probability that corn muffins
will replace sheet cakes as the official baked goods of the Michael
teachings.” Apparently this is a significant trend, because, according to
them, this is also happening in several alternate realities (in one, edging
out rock bread, surely an improvement). Nothing against sheet cakes, I’m
sure, but this is a New Age! We mustn’t cling to the sheet cakes of the
past. Maybe the Tao is calling upon us to make a strong statement against
ethanol, but I’d like to think that, in a win-win paradigm, we can drive our
corn muffins and eat them, too.

All the best corn,
Shepherd

No Comments »

Seeing & Announcements

SEEING

The drama of human existence can be so absorbing that people stop seeing the real world around them. It’s like being so caught up in a television program that one loses awareness of the room.

In order to make happier choices, it is helpful to detach from the drama so as to better place it in a true context. One way to do this is to challenge yourself to really see what is in your physical environment. A pleasurable exercise is to look for details in nature that you might tend to gloss over, such as the shape and color of leaves, the texture of bark, and so forth.

–Michael channeled by Shepherd Hoodwin, July 23, 2008

GROUP CHANNELINGS:

BEARSVILLE, NY (Adjacent to Woodstock): Wednesday, July 30, 7 p.m., Bearsville School for Young Artists, 31 Wittenberg Rd.

NEW YORK CITY: Monday, August 4, 7 p.m., TRS, 44 E. 32nd 11th fl. (Park/Mad).

MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA (Contact me for location): Sunday, August 10, 3 p.m.

TUCSON NOVEMBER MICHAEL TEACHINGS WORKSHOP:

http://summerjoy.com/tucson.html

SAMPLE MICHAEL READING CHART AND EXPLANATION:

http://summerjoy.com/michaelreading.html

MICHAELTEACHINGS.COM OVERLEAVES DATABASE

Dave Gregg is assembling a series of fascinating pages that show photos of people who are all, for example, servers with an artisan essence twin, and then by their casting (for instance, priest-cast). This is a great tool for learning to recognize roles, etc.

We’re seeking more photos to include. If I’ve channeled your chart and have your photo, please drop me an email if it’s okay to forward them to Dave. Or contact him directly at michaelteachings (at) gmail.com.

http://www.michaelteachings.com/overleaves_database.html

LISTEN TO RECENT MICHAEL TEACHINGS ONLINE TELECLASS and CHANNELINGS:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/MichaelTeachings

PHOTOS FROM MICHAEL STUDENTS POTLUCK IN MY HOME:

http://picasaweb.google.com/ShepherdHoodwin/MichaelStudentsPotluckJune282008

Feel free to spread the word about the channeling events in the next few weeks, and the Tucson workshop. Thanks!

All the best,
Shepherd

No Comments »

Changing Your Life

Many at this time are feeling uncomfortably restricted by old forms of consciousness, like a child who is wearing clothes that are a size too small. To make a different analogy, it is the stress of giving birth–the pressure building to a sometimes painful level–which is necessary in order to give birth to the new. You are betwixt and between: you are no longer in the old, but not yet in the new. Once a baby is moving through the birth canal, it cannot go backwards into the womb. Once you have moved towards a new consciousness, you cannot return to the old. In a real sense, it is not there anymore. There is not much one can do except keep moving ahead. Otherwise, you risk being stillborn. Your goal on a soul level is to move past this highly uncomfortable intermediary state and experience yourselves to be more solidly in the new.

There is a natural resistance to change, especially on the physical plane. Our experience of that resistance on the causal plane is more subtle. It is based on the fact that the thought forms that we “inhabit” are established. There is no resistance to these changes in an emotional sense; it’s just that new ones naturally build on what has been before, so it would not be useful if these were so fluid that they were suddenly obliterated and we were starting with something new. Eventually, they will be quite different, but what is established presents a natural resistance to there being a great deal of change at once. This is the nature of intellect. On the physical plane, if your intellect completely morphed from one thing to another, you would have no way of dealing with it, and you would go insane. So there is nothing wrong with this resistance; the universe is structured this way for a good reason.

The medium of the astral plane is emotion. Emotions are like water–they are fluid. They are designed to change more readily, yet the ocean, for example, while it is always changing, also has a precise ecosystem that needs to be maintained as there are changes. Shorelines may erode or expand, and the bottom of the ocean may shift under water–mountains may become smaller or larger, for example; the currents move things around. However, the basic equilibrium must also be maintained.

Oceans are now becoming quite polluted. If humans stop polluting immediately, it will not eliminate all the pollution that is already there, but gradually the oceans will heal themselves. So emotions, even though volatile, are not as truly changeable as they might appear. Your surface emotions may change on a dime like wave patterns, but they all spring from the overall “ocean ecology” that you live with emotionally day in and day out. So the overall body of emotions also organically resists too much change all at once. Occasionally, there are tidal waves, but they are the exception rather than the rule. Similarly, with the intellectual body, there may be earthquakes that break up some of the structures of consciousness, but they too, are exceptional.

The physical plane also has a built-in resistance to change, and because it is the densest plane of all, the resistance to change is greater. Although your fluid emotions and evolving intellect may be willing for there to be great changes, by necessity they cannot manifest in physical reality as quickly. The intellect is the container for experience. They say that you form your reality to some degree based on your beliefs. These are not just the beliefs that you know about, but all your beliefs, which are the containers, first, for your emotions, and then, for your physical reality. Someone whose beliefs are calcified, who refuses to change his or her intellectual framework, assumptions, and habits, will find it very hard to shift emotionally and then physically.

A person with a fluidly evolving intellect may then get stuck at the emotional level. If there are defenses against emotions changing (again, these are not always consciously recognized), that will prevent evolution on an emotional level, and therefore in physical experience. Let’s say a person is angry or resentful. If he is determined to hold on to that, even though the mind understands in a more exalted way, change is restricted. If, however, your thoughts are evolving and your emotions are fluid without defenses, then you can focus on what can bring change on a physical level. There is the saying about the spirit being willing but the flesh being weak. Perhaps we could think of that as your intellect being flexible and your emotions being fluid, but you still can’t seem to move things in your physical plane, day-to-day life experience. This is the level where many of you are working now: You want what is new, but you can’t get there yet. It is like being in a car that is stuck in in mud: you’re putting the gas on but the wheels are spinning; you can’t move forward.

If this is your challenge, the first place to look is in the various energy fields of your life. Your most personal energy field is your aura. Auras can expand and shrink in size, but for practical purposes, let’s think of it as being about a meter around your skin in all directions, and, of course, including your physical body as well. As a general rule, your aura reflects your thoughts and your feelings. However, it also is influenced by your environment. It’s like your home, which collects dust just from the air moving through it, as well as from the natural biological processes of your body, and those of others who inhabit the space. In addition, insects may come into your home even if you keep all the windows and doors closed, because your home is, after all, part of the larger ecology, no matter how well sealed it is.

So you clean your home from time to time. You remove excess dust and perhaps you eliminate insects. Many of them are harmless, but some of them can destroy your food supply. Termites can eat away at the very foundation of your home if you don’t do something about them. It is like that with your aura. It is the larger home of your body on the physical plane. Your aura is physical, like the body, but it is at faster vibration in the physical plane, which is why it is only physically seen in rare circumstances. Nonetheless, you feel its effect. If your aura is clean and full of light, it feels very different to be in than if it is dirty and crawling with metaphorical insects. Just the same as with your home. Even a confirmed slob feels better in a home once it is cleaned up, even if he or she does not have the wherewithal to personally make that happen. You may not know how to clean your aura, but you feel it if someone else does it for you, for example a healer, or during these channelings. We are working with each of you now to help you clean your aura if that is your wish, if you are willing to let go of what it contains that doesn’t really belong.

Sometimes people become attached to their clutter and debris, and even though part of them wants it cleaned up, if someone else tries to help, the person may object–there may be mixed feelings about letting go, not wanting something to be disturbed. This is extreme inertia, or resistance to change, when even the dust and garbage must not be touched.

The most direct way to clean your aura is to spend a few minutes and simply focus your consciousness on this happening. Why don’t you, if you wish, do that now. Some people are visual. If that is the case, you can visualize a space of about a meter all around you, and ask that it start to look clearer and lighter. Notice what it looks like now, and hold a vision of what you want it to look like. Or ask it, what it would ideally be, and hold the space for that to happen. If you are approaching this visually you may not know if it should look clear or be full of brilliant colors. The goal here is that it look and feel clean, and anything else is fine, except that it should reflect who you really are, just like you would like your home to reflect who you really are, with your tastes and colors you like. You want it to be homey and hospitable, first of all, to you. If you are not so visual, you can take feeling picture of what it would ideally feel like to be in your space and hold your focus on that for a few minutes. There are other ways to do this, but these are two that will work for most people.

Feel your aura becoming sparklingly clean. Feel it being a true, comfortable home for you. Ask now that any energies in your aura that are not a part of who you are in this moment be released. You may have picked up energies, negative or not, from all the people you have interacted with recently, and even in the distant past. You may have deliberately, albeit unconsciously, saved some energy fragments because you wanted to help the person that they belonged to or because there was something that interested you and you wanted to try to figure it out. It can get to be like the shut-ins who have stacks of hundreds of newspapers that they never get around to reading, and yet the stacks make it impossible to really live in the home. It blocks movement within in it. So if you are willing, let everything that is not you in this moment be cleared out. You will not lose anything that is valuable to you. If you need to still deal with something, it will come back to you. Of course, it is the negative or destructive energies, characterized by resentment, bitterness or sadness that causes the greatest problems. But even the more neutral or even positive bits of energy that are not yours get in the way of the changes that you hunger for. So it is good to clear your personal space of everything. It is not a bad idea to do it a couple times a day, say, in the morning and in the evening. This does not have to take a long time. It is more the fact that you are taking ownership of your personal space, and are issuing your own parameters. It is like taking charge of your home and saying, all right, in the past I have let things fall where they may, but now I am making a choice, and this is now how it is to be.

As with cleaning your physical home, if you keep up with aura cleansing, it doesn’t get too bad. However, if you are just now dealing with it after a long period, it will take some time to put it all in order. Still, if you hold the intention, it will be accomplished.

We made the analogy of insects infiltrating your physical home, in addition to dust and clutter. Let’s say that some food starts to spoil in your cupboard. After a while, it will attract insects that wish to feed on it. If you don’t tend to it quickly, it can turn into quite an ordeal. The vibrational equivalent of spoiling food in your cupboard is your harbored negative, destructive emotions as they begin to fester.

In the larger scheme of things, there is nothing wrong with the negative–it is a necessary part of the whole, just as there is nothing wrong with the fact that food spoils: when it is not used, the destructive force breaks it down so that it can go back to the earth. This is perfectly acceptable for the compost pile; it is less convenient in your kitchen cabinets.

There is a place for anger, for example. It is an energy designed to create a boundary, and push things away. However, when anger festers in you, it starts to get rotten and sends an odorous “dinner bell” out to the vibrational insects or “entities” that feed off anger.

Let’s say you left some spoiling food in a kitchen cabinet and went on vacation. You would likely come back to find much of your house full of insects. They would have become such a strong presence that they might have forced their way into other food stores. Similarly, if you let your anger, bitterness, judgments, or other destructive emotions fester for a long time, you will have a hard time cleaning out your aura to the point where it is sparkling. It can be done, but you will have your work cut out for you.

This comes back to the fluid ocean of the emotional body: are you willing to let go of these festering emotions that are attracting these insects? This is not say that you have resolved them all. The only question here is, Are you willing? If you are, you will find a way to heal them. Willingness is more intellectual; it is the thought form, the intent.

Let’s say that humanity makes a collective decision to clean up the oceans, that it will do what it can to stop polluting them. Eventually, the ocean would right itself, and you would stop having nasty debris washing up on the shore.

Some people want it both ways; they want to hang on to their bitterness, but they want to stop feeling the bad feelings that result from being bitter. You can’t have it both ways. Many people turn to substance abuse of various kinds because they are seeking to run away from feeling bad, but they aren’t willing yet to let go of what is making them feel bad.

We don’t mean to generalize too much, because everyone’s story is unique. Sometimes people wish to escape not their own negative emotions, but things they are picking up from their own environment. In any case, if there is a solid intent, the change will come.

If you discover a bad infestation of insects in your house, and you begin to clean it out, you may be battling this for some time, but if you keep it up, eventually you will gain the upper hand. You may discover other food sources that have gone rotten that you didn’t think to examine before. Similarly, with your evolution as a person, you may think you have thrown away all your rotting anger only to later unearth some more in a different cupboard, so you clean that out, disinfect it, and just keep working at it.

Eventually, you will have gotten things under control. You’ve done a thorough cleaning of your home; there are still a few stray insects, but you are staying on top of it. Now your effort is directed toward making it a more homey and pleasant environment. Maybe you add some houseplants, or you redecorate a little; perhaps, you paint.

The equivalent of this in your aura is working to radiate love in your day-to-day interactions, choosing to be a little more cheerful, for example. We’re not speaking of something artificial here, but you are always making choices, and you can deliberately find what is already within you that is more cheerful. Most people would like their homes to be cheerful. You would not take that to an extreme–you would not put pictures of clowns in orange and red on every wall. However, you would probably enjoy having some bright touches in your environment. If your house were all black and white, you might find that having some dashes of color here and there could be quite a relief. The same with your personality. People do vary in their natural capacity for cheer; some prefer it more than others. If you would prefer more than you have, then it is up to you to provide it. Maybe you can
influence others around to add to your efforts.

One of the great spiritual principles is cultivating gratitude. Like cheerfulness, this is a choice that is available for anyone to make. The reason gratitude is so useful is that it is the natural state of all things. If you, for example, commune with nature, standing alone in a dense, rich forest, the reason that feels so good is that each tree, plant, and animal naturally exists in a state of gratitude, “breathing” it in and out. Gratitude doesn’t always come so easily to human beings because the more advanced intellect, triggered by fear, comes up with a litany of reasons not to feel grateful. Probably the majority of human beings do not breathe in and out with freedom, whereas most plants and animals have no choice in the matter; they are constantly experiencing their oneness with all things. A plant cannot stop photosynthesis even if it somehow wanted to.

Some spiritual practices focus on the breath. When you liberate your breath, when your body is breathing as it naturally wants to, it experiences gratitude. It is fully receptive to the oxygen in the air that would feed it, and then contributes back into the air what the air needs from it.

Gratitude is not talking yourself into thinking you are happy with things that you are not happy about; it is viscerally feeling the goodness of life because you are connected with it. Notice your breathing now. If it is not as free as you would like it to be, ask your body to show you how it would like to breathe. When you are not breathing freely, some part of you is hanging on too hard. If you notice that you are not breathing easily, you might ask yourself, What am I holding on to? And then, Am I willing to let it go? It doesn’t mean that you will let it go immediately, but if you are willing, you will eventually.

Those of you who have animal companions have probably benefited from observing their relative lack of neurosis. They can pick up some from the humans around them, but they have less of an ability to get in their own way. However, being sentient does bring with it a higher consciousness, potentially, and a wider range of choices. If you choose to be in harmony with the universe in the way that particularly wild animals and everything else in nature are, while still developing your uniquely human intellect and emotions, you will demonstrate a magnificence greater than what is possible to those beings with a narrower range of choice. It is not easily accomplished, which is why you have so many lifetimes and such difficult challenges. However, that is the point of coming as you do to the physical plane, and as we once did: to learn how to be natural *and* more conscious. By confronting all of the things that hamper evolution while in the body, you are challenged to draw from your deepest resources.

The body itself is designed to resist too much physical change because its number one need is to feel safe. As a conscious soul incarnate in a human animal body, you can alleviate your own body’s resistance to change and move your life forward by providing for your body and reassuring its safety. The better you take care of your physical body, the more willing it will be to allow change in your life.

All of these steps come before you are able to do anything about the larger world. If you clean house for yourself, and start to practice cheerfulness and thankfulness, then you may be able to be a positive force for change with other people, and with society in general. When you get good at cleaning your own aura, you can start to clean the auras of those with whom you are connected: your family members, your friends, and your co-workers. If they don’t want it clean, your work will not stick, but you can at least do your part in your bond with them. It may give them options, too; they may move from stasis by your reminding them that they could feel better.

People have commented on the irony of people fighting for peace. Obviously, there is no peace when you are fighting. We don’t want to be nit-picky about semantics. Perhaps you could say that a lot of these people were “campaigning” for peace, but if a peace demonstration erupts in violence, you certainly do not have peace.

Like anger, there is a place for violence–violence breaks things down. Sometimes nature is violent; we mentioned tidal waves and earthquakes. However, violence in nature is relatively rare. If you want peace in the world, you have to be peaceful. If you are waiting for everyone else to become peaceful first, you will no doubt die before that happens. You cannot do a great deal about the rest of the world. However, you can be an example and inspiration.

No positive act is ever wasted. There are people in your life who may harvest the understanding and benefit from an act of generosity on your part lifetimes from now. Most of you are doing a lot more good in the world than you have any way of knowing. You will not often get a letter, say, from someone who was difficult in your life saying that she appreciates your example, and that it has helped her. Obviously, you will not get a letter from her to that effect if your good work was in another lifetime. However, you can rest assured that when you bring light, it has some positive effect somewhere, somehow. And even if it didn’t, it is of benefit to you, for your own growth, because that is precisely what you are practicing by being a physical human being. You don’t have anything better to do on the physical plane or anywhere else than to shine your light to the best of your ability. As you practice that, your ability grows.

The manifestations of the Infinite Soul through Lao Tzu, Jesus, Buddha, and Krishna are striking examples of how an impact of light continues to reverberate through time. This is true of negative acts also, but positive ones reverberate much more.

Q: How does one work with others who have messy auras without accepting the mess for oneself in the process of trying to work with them?

A. That is a great question, and there is no one simple answer. When other people join your aura, you can work with the combined aura much the same way that you work with your own personal aura, because now there is, you could say, an extension of yourself: you combined with that other person. So if you notice that your combined aura is not what you would like it to be, then you can do the same type of work starting with your intention to clean out the aura that you share with that other person.

As you raise your personal vibration, you will either attract people who want to be at that higher place, maybe with less anger, for example, or you will repel them because they don’t want to change. If the latter is the case, you are wise to let them go.

If it is someone you are required to interact with, a co-worker, perhaps, you can allow there to be more distance between you. Let’s say there is someone you used to bond with in mutual negativity (you both hated the same people, for example), and now you no longer wish to harbor those kinds of energies that weigh you down; the other person will either choose to change or not to change. If the other person chooses to stay in his heavier, stickier energies of hating this other person, you may need to let go of that relationship. So when you raise your vibration, it reconfigures everything in your life, and it will bring up issues for you that will, if you use them to your advantage, accelerate your own growth. It may not be easy, but it is infinitely worthwhile.

Perhaps all this sounds like a great deal of work. The physical plane itself is a lot of work, but the work of raising your vibration is rewarding, to say the least. It gives you immediate benefits and long term benefits. It is well worth the trouble.

Q: I live in a dense city. Would you address how to deal with that?

A. When you live in a big city, it is more challenging to maintain your personal clarity that you may have worked hard to attain within your own apartment once you go out in public. We recommend that you practice, before you go out the door, compacting your aura. Bring it in say within six inches of your skin rather than three feet. If you just visualize and feel that a few times you can quickly get a feel for how to do it with just the intention. For some people this is a little uncomfortable, but it is temporary until you reach a destination, where you can bring it out a little bit, and then we would suggest that you clear yourself of anything you have picked up along the way. After a while, this gets to be second nature. You will probably not completely eliminate the influence of the city; it is simply not as easy as living in the wide open spaces. However, you can at least manage it better with techniques like this. Also, as you go out and about, ask for your guides to offer some added protection to your energy. A golden color can be especially useful to visualize protection when you go out into a crowded place.

Q. I have a major project of cleaning, sorting and compacting belongings in my own apartment that cannot be done in a day or a week. I am trying to work with balancing my energy so to that I don’t get dragged down and stuck. How can I not be overwhelmed with the task at hand, especially when I wake up in the midst of it every day?

A. We would suggest you start with your own aura because if your own aura is not clear, you won’t be able to accomplish anything in your space, and that only needs to take a couple of minutes. A good discipline would be to limit yourself to one corner at a time; don’t try to do it all at once. If you can make a small area the way you want it to be, it will give you the confidence and the momentum to move on to the next. You might also see if you have a friend who can help you who has good skills with that.

Closing Meditation

Surround yourself with the most beautiful energy you can imagine, as if you were in bliss, full of gratitude and peace. If you can imagine this, you can start to create that in your life.

Love and blessings to each of you. We are available to help you on your path.

No Comments »

Gossip

I was fascinated to read that it is now believed that gossip evolved to serve a once-useful survival purpose: to keep a society’s members in line. For example, if someone wasn’t pulling his weight (which could be detrimental to everyone’s survival during hard times), gossip would put pressure on him by threatening expulsion.

Part of soul evolution is to transcend, in the creature of reason we inhabit, hard-wiring that is no longer constructive; in doing so, we make *choices* rather than letting ourselves be controlled by “baser” impulses. This isn’t the same as repression–what is repressed inevitably comes back up later–it’s becoming more conscious. It’s recognizing that our bodies have many inbred tendencies in our instinctive center to ensure their survival on automatic pilot. They will throw up many impulses that may not be the best available choices if we wish to live in agape. One example is reacting in violence, when our sentience gives us a lot more options for diplomacy than are hardwired into us. When we as souls are pulled in a destructive direction but consciously choose another, we grow; we establish ourselves as being more than our bodies, with all their self-protective mechanisms. By consciously choosing, we exercise and grow our ability to be creators, not just reactors.

It’s like learning to ride a horse. Our body self is an untamed horse; our growth task is to learn to ride it smoothly in the service of love.

There are many other hard-wired traits that can trip us up. For example, people who wish to be monogamous fight the biological imperative to spread their seed as far and wide as possible (survival of the fittest). Aggression once helped males get mates because it demonstrated their ability to protect their family. Now, we more often recognize when it becomes abusive and see other options (although the caveman mentality is still evident throughout our society in various ways).

All manners of pettiness can also be traced to how our instincts react under fear: gossip’s cousins judgmentalness, exclusion, and even demonization can be used to make others conform in a primitive society. The fear of foreigners, of “not us,” is part of our hardwiring: it is natural that there would be a fear of what has not yet been proven safe in primitive cultures. It is showing up now in the hysteria about illegal immigration in the U.S., which, objectively speaking, is “much ado about nothing”: many studies have shown that the problems and benefits cancel each other out–it’s a wash. Emotions run hot because it triggers these ancient survival mechanisms (and politicians manipulate them). This “us vs. them” mentality may at one point have ensured our ancestors’ survival, but, ironically, it now threatens it. If we can’t transcend and transmute these base instincts, we *won’t* survive.

Many animals are territorial–they mark and enforce their boundaries, sometimes unto death. When we see this in humans, along with competition, backstabbing to get ahead, and doing anything else “necessary” to survive, we can see instincts at work. As we grow spiritually, we begin to measure what we think and feel vs. a yardstick of love. We sense what will pull down our vibration and what will raise it, and we resist what pulls us down. As the quote goes, we learn to not believe everything we think and feel. We ask ourselves if they’re in alignment with love, truth, and beauty.

In Michael’s terms, when destructive instincts arise, they enlist false personality to their cause. The particular way we rationalize being petty is our chief feature: we tell ourselves the lie that, in order to survive, we have to dig in our heels, hold onto control, or put others down, as the case may be. That, in turn, triggers the negative poles of the roles and overleaves in a domino effect.

Gossip, in particular, is a running judgmental commentary on other people’s actions. It used to be thought of being especially the domain of older women, perhaps who didn’t have anything better to do, but it’s been since shown that men do it about equally–just about everyone gossips. Some Michael students think that sages do it more than others, but I don’t observe that: sages are just more vocal about it.

It’s true that if we are steamed up about something, venting in a safe place can let off some of that steam and make us feel better. We all get steamed up sometimes. But this begs the question: why are we steamed? What needs growth and healing in us that causes us to be so reactive? Why do we care so much about other people’s choices? If we observe ourselves gossiping, it’s a clear sign that we need to get a life. If we need drama, that’s why God created television. And movies, and books. They’re usually a lot more interesting.

Michael had said that we’re responsible only for our own choices, and for dependents such as children and/or elderly parents we’ve volunteered to care for. Maybe “only” is not the best word here: being responsible for ourselves is a full-time job. If we’re paying full attention to our own choices, our words, attitudes, ways of being, etc., we do not have time to be evaluating what others should be doing. It’s none of our business.

Some feel that the world would be boring without gossip. If we weren’t talking negatively about others, what would we be doing? It can be addictive, like cigarettes or alcohol–it can seem to fill a void. However, when we let go of addictions, we can find many more-fulfilling pleasures to take their place.

One of the key lessons of life is knowing what is ours to choose, and what is others to choose. Certainly, the choices of others affect us to some degree–it’s not cut-and-dried. The way other people do their jobs, for example, may have some impact on me–someone dealing with my problem at a business or government agency, for instance. It is certainly my choice if I wish to plead my case, but if, in the end, it is not my decision, that’s the way it is. If there is a higher chain of command, I might then choose to go over the person’s head, but ultimately, someone who has the choice besides me will make the call, and I either abide by that or make myself miserable railing against it. I have countless choices to make every day, but I don’t get to choose for others. Accepting other people’s choices gracefully when we don’t agree with them is part of maturity. If we want others to accept our “no,” we have to also be able to take no for an answer.

In every group, there are conflicts either out front or behind the scenes. We’re all imperfect humans, and none of us are immune to such things. Still, I think that more humility on everyone’s part would go a long way towards resolving them. In such things, it’s predictable that most assume that the problems are other people’s fault. That, itself, is the real problem. If we would take responsibility, respect other people’s choices and right to choose, and focus on our own lives, most of the drama would cease. Instead, we harden into tribal polarization, demonizing certain people and taking sides: things are reduced to simplistic good guys vs. bad guys, and that’s rarely the way it really is. The lines are drawn according to these ancient survival instincts rather than good sense. It’s a huge energy drain for all concerned, and sad.

Inevitably, one is reminded of Rodney King’s question, “Can we all get along?” Whatever it is, let it go. Do we need to talk about others negatively so much? Do we need to be angry to feel alive and powerful? Does our sense of worth hinge on being better than some other people? How much of this is the same-old same-old tribalism, the instinctive center feeling threatened? Don’t we really know better than this? If we want to learn agape, we need to practice being kind, respectful, and compassionate when it’s not easy to do so. As Jesus said, anyone can do it when it’s easy.

If we have a grievance against someone, it’s best to take it directly to that person. Talking about it with others isn’t going to solve the problem. If we try and don’t get satisfaction, then it’s a growth opportunity to let it go and move on. Nursing grudges disempowers us. If we’re fixated on something and can’t let it go, that’s a big clue about what we need to heal in ourselves. There are things that have taken me years to let go of; it’s not easy sometimes. We don’t heal immediately because we have the right attitude, but taking responsibility for ourselves is where it starts.

Yes, some people have done some terrible things. They’ve also done some wonderful things. Yes, some are more dysfunctional and difficult and karmaholic than others, and some we may choose to avoid, but there aren’t too many Joseph Stalin types around. If you want to demonize him, I’d go along with that. Probably Dick Cheney, too, although he has a really nice wife who writes steamy lesbian fiction, so I’d probably just say that he’s a paranoid lying fearmonger with some good traits, too (he stood by his gay daughter; he doesn’t beat his dog). But I can’t get too enthusiastic about demonizing most people. I don’t like everyone, but I can usually see most people’s humanity.

Obviously, there are things worth fighting for and against. There are times when a boundary needs to be made, when a stand needs to be taken. But most of the time, we are better served by ignoring what we don’t wish to feed energy to. Just don’t react. Don’t defend. Stay open. Keep your sense of humor. If nothing else, stay silent. It takes two to tango (and in case you didn’t get enough cliches already, I might add: Make love, not war, and Don’t worry, be happy). False personality has to be right all the time; true personality can bend. If we want peace on earth, we have to start locally, where we are. Do we want peace, or do we want to be right? Not peace at any price, but peace is of great value, not worth throwing away because we’re triggered. Self-righteousness is the enemy of peace. Self-righteousness is directly proportional to maya (illusion). It’s simply not statistically possible that everyone who thinks he’s right actually is, but even when, objectively speaking, we are faultless, self-righteousness is not helpful. For one thing, it’s a killjoy. A good sense of humor, especially about ourselves, is a potent antidote to it. If we’re embroiled in drama, we really need to lighten up, in more ways than one.

We all have blind spots. If someone criticizes me, I start from the assumption that there might be something to it, and I look at it. However, it is my choice to do so, and it is my choice as to whether I finally agree with the criticism. If others do not choose to look at themselves, that is their right. Ultimately, I find that there are some people I don’t wish to have in my life because I can’t find the win-win–again, my choice. And if others don’t wish to have me in their life, that, too, is their choice. There are plenty of positive things to focus on; focusing on the negatives proliferates them. We need to deal with them pragmatically, but if that’s all that’s on our horizon, we’re not living. I speak as someone who has not found it easy to focus on the positives–I feel every pea under the mattress. But I’m working on it. As the saying goes, when life hands you peas, make pea soup. Then we can have whirled peas.

Someday, probably after we’re dead, we’re all going to have a good laugh with our friends about the dumb things we fought about. I’ll meet you at the Astral Bar and Grill. And then we can talk about the outrageous things those *other* people did on the physical plane. SO much worse than us. Won’t that be fun?

– Shepherd Hoodwin

No Comments »

Next »